All benchmarks

Head-to-head

ChatGPT‑6 vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is fast and plugged into X; ChatGPT-6 answers with higher quality and a free preview, trading away raw speed.

xAI

The verdict

Grok 4.6 is quick, agentic and cheap, with native access to real-time X data. ChatGPT-6 answers with higher composite intelligence and coding scores and a free preview, at the cost of raw throughput. If your work is latency-sensitive or depends on live social data, Grok is the pick; if it's reasoning and coding quality on a budget, ChatGPT-6 wins comfortably.

Side by side

The same figures from our full benchmark table, narrowed to two columns.

Metric
ChatGPT-6
Grok 4.6
Intelligence Index71*65
Agentic coding86*76
Context window400K500K
Max output128K64K
Throughput (tps)58*120
Price / 1M out$0$6
Multimodal
Open weights
Free to use
Where ChatGPT-6 wins
  • Free during preview vs $6 per million output tokens
  • Higher composite intelligence and coding score
  • Double the max output (128K vs 64K tokens)
  • No account required to start
Where Grok 4.6 leads
  • Much higher throughput (tokens per second)
  • Native, real-time access to X data
  • Lower latency for quick back-and-forth

Which should you choose?

Pick ChatGPT-6 if

You want the strongest reasoning and coding for free, and latency isn't critical.

Pick Grok 4.6 if

You want the fastest responses or live data from X.

Try ChatGPT-6 free

No account, no card, no app — open the chat and compare for yourself.

Open the chat